Don’t release convicts, prior consultation must: Centre to TN

0
228

February 20, 2014

Citing Sec 435, CrPC, under which TN sought to remit the sentence, Centre says the law states that the powers ‘shall not be exercised by the state govt except after consultation with the Centre’

February 20, 2014

Citing Sec 435, CrPC, under which TN sought to remit the sentence, Centre says the law states that the powers ‘shall not be exercised by the state govt except after consultation with the Centre’

Two female police officers stand behind Murugan, alias Das, left, and Nalini, second left, in the courtroom after being arrested as suspects in the Rajiv Gandhi murder case, in Chengalpet on June 15, 1991

New Delhi: The Centre today asked the Tamil Nadu government not to release seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case saying there must be prior consultation before such a decision is taken.

In a communication to the Tamil Nadu government, the Home Ministry has conveyed that the seven accused were prosecuted under central laws like TADA, Arms Act etc, hence prior consultation with the central government was necessary.

Citing Section 435 of CrPC under which the Tamil Nadu government sought to remit the sentence, the Centre said the law categorically said the powers "shall not be exercised by the state government except after consultation with the central government".

The law also made it clear that prior consultation with the central government was necessary in any case which was investigated by CBI, set up under Delhi Special Police Establishment Act.

Sources said the Home Ministry has conveyed that the opinion of the presiding judge of the court or by which the conviction was confirmed has to be taken before remission of the sentence. But no such move was taken by the Tamil Nadu government.

The ministry said whenever an investigation is done under central laws, the views of the central government prevail in case of giving remittance. It said the decision to set free the seven convicts in the sensational case is against all principles of justice and legally not tenable.


Courtesy: IANS